MatthewGnann.com

…reading, writing, no arithmetic.

Archive for the ‘What I'm Reading’ Category

Atomic Inspiration

Posted by mgnann on February 19, 2010

Currently, I’m in the middle of a book titled Uranium, by Tom Zoellner. I can’t remember where I first heard about it, but after I did, I set out to the bookstore to pick it up. Unfortunately, they only had a hardback and the inside cover flap contained the wallet-punching: U.S. $26.95. With the price of books not being the issue here, let me just say I wasn’t able to pay that. So when I found it in the bargain bin at Borders for THREE DOLLARS, I snatched that bad boy up.

A little further than halfway, so far it has been a really interesting read. Since the 1200’s, the rock known as uranium has been at the center of a widening gyre of scientific breakthrough, technology inspired advancement in political power, and greed induced mining. Looking at this, it seems naturally allegorical to compare the way uranium wildly casts off particles in an effort to achieve rest (this instability being the source of radiation and the basic principle behind the atomic bomb) with the history of mankind attempting to harness uranium in order to achieve peace and wealth—yet invariably creating mostly destruction, corruption, and war.

Woah, sorry! I didn’t mean to get all back-cover book review on you. It is just a subject I really find interesting. How thematically rich is a story about an esoteric stone that contains the potential for life changing transmutations? That is modern day alchemy, folks.

Related is a book that I read within the past year, Tuxedo Park, by Jennet Conant. This book is about the private scientific labs of Alfred Loomis, where much of the research that went into creating the atomic bombs dropped on Japan were derived from. It covers much more than that, but what drew me to it was the advancements of technology that came during that time.

The history of science is a theme I’ve explored in many of my own stories. Another is the way war forces mankind to evolve. Most recently this occurs in As Above, So Below, and there are elements of duality in this next story, Traces, as well.

Some of my deepest inspiration comes from reading non-fiction like these two books. This passage in Uranium, where Zoellner quotes the wife of a scientist regarding the local Zuni Indians hired to do construction at Los Alamos, really gets my creative juices going:

“There they were, the oldest peoples of America, conservative, unchanged, barely touched by our industrial civilization, working on a project with an object so radical that it would be hailed as initiating a new age.”

To wrap it all up, there is just a ying and yang about this subject that really pushes my creative buttons. The connections between the past and the future contain an endless amount of possibilities; literary, scientifically, and politically. Even while I sit here finishing this blog post, I see Vice President Biden speaking about increasing spending to insure the U.S.’s aged nuclear arsenal remains ready and capable, with an ultimate goal of reducing these weapons around the world, and I am reminded of another quote contained in Zoellner’s work. This one is from Winston Churchill, whom the bomb detonated over Nagasaki and nicknamed Fat Man, was possibly named after:

“If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is make the rubble bounce.”

So have a good Friday, and remember, watch out for blinding flashes of light in the sky!

Posted in AASB, Traces, What I'm Reading, Writing | Leave a Comment »

What I’m Reading

Posted by mgnann on March 3, 2009

Right now I am almost finished with A Feast for Crows, the last completed book in George R.R. Martin’s Song of Ice and Fire series. Originally I wanted to hold off on starting another unfinished series, but I decided to read the first book to see if it was something I would like and suddenly I found myself three books in. The series is just too good to put down.

I think the next book, A Dance with Dragons, is slated to be out sometime this year. I’ll be really excited to see what happens with my favorite characters, most of which were not included in A Feast for Crows. Until then I wont be a jerk about the release, there are countless other works I want to read.

One is this new book, Anathem, by Neal Stephenson. When I heard about it I wiki’d the author. He also has a series of novels called The Baroque Cycle that seem to be close to historical fiction, while Stephenson himself has called them science fiction. I enjoy such ambiguity between genres.

The baroque era and the late years of the Scientific Revolution is a time period of great interest to me because I am trying to write during a fictional period of Enlightenment. It always helps to see how others do this type of thing.

So after I’m done with A Feast for Crows I’m not sure what I’ll read next, Anathem, or start the The Baroque Cycle. Eventually I’m sure I will read both, so the question is really where to start.

Finally, I want to mention something I have been reading online. On the Tor website there is a (official) re-read of The Wheel of Time series. The lady-person doing the re-read gives a good synopsis of each chapter, then offers some commentary about what happened. She is really very funny and super insightful. I urge anyone who is a fan of the series and is anxious for Sanderson to get us to Tarmon Gai’don, but doesn’t have the time to re-read the extensive series themselves to check it out.

So that’s it for today. I’ll end things with a quote. This is from an interview with Neal Stephenson speaking about the similarities between what computer programmers and novelists do. Now I’m no programmer, but this makes me nod my head up and down.

“In both cases one is trying to build a great big system of words. It is highly structured. The structure has many layers of hierarchy. And there are many links that bind different parts of the structure together, and those links must all be sorted out. It all amounts to a quite elaborate thing. But one can’t work directly on the structure itself; the only way actually to build it is by writing one letter at a time.”

Posted in What I'm Reading | Leave a Comment »

Speculative Fiction as Philosophy

Posted by mgnann on October 1, 2008

“People who view fantasy as second rate or childish are usually people who don’t read or understand it. I like to tell them that good fantasy is social commentary combined with good storytelling – Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, the Oz stories and so many others. Sure, the stories take place in an imaginary world. But those worlds mirror our own and tell us things about ourselves that need to be said and understood. I also like to tell them how often other forms of literature use fantasy as the bedrock of their own stories. Fantasy transcends its own form in wider scope than any other type of writing. So those who don’t like it probably haven’t found the right story or storyteller and need to give it another shot.” – Q& A with Terry Brooks.

So I’m asking myself, when did I understand fiction could function as philosophical literature? Since I cannot point to a certain event or realization, I would have to say it was something that came to me over time, like the tide coming in slowly so that you do not realize it’s arrival until your shit is all wet.

By speculative fiction I mean fiction with settings or themes which differ from what is found in our own world and is presented with the intentional purpose of considering the results of the differences. This can include, but is not limited to, science fiction, horror, fantasy, and the type of hero fiction most commonly associated with comic books

It is in these stories authors often remove or change that which is most inherent to our familiar society. In science fiction, the setting is often space, or another planet. In fantasy, religion and the gods behind it frequently compose the central change. In horror, we might deal with a broken civilization due to the consequences of a braaaiin eating zombie outbreak.

While its true that the real reason I started writing a fantasy novel is because I was a fifteen year old nerd, that has changed a little over time. I began to see that the fantasy setting was really the best medium to explore some philosophical, religious, and historical ideas that interested me. I saw I could isolate these things in a vacuum that either highlighted or tore down their most fundamental aspects so as to explore the theoretical repercussions on people and community.

For example: I wondered how interesting it could it be to explore an information Singularity as an inverse of the creation story told by the 10 emanations of the Sephirot? I liked the idea so much it became a central plot line in the book. The main character, Kabladan, is working to bring a sort of information Singularity to his world, while some of his opponents adhere to the idea that some knowledge is sinful. (Heard that old yarn that says original sin came when we ate from the Tree of Knowledge?)

Believe me, I didn’t plan it that way–I’m not that smart. But while writing I began to see the place for such thoughts which lent heavily to plot and character development. Also I began to explore other works that did similar things, trying to see how these authors had mastered the symbiosis between story-telling and theoretical considerations.

In Harry Turtledove’s Darkness series he recreates a world that is much like our own and tells a story that is similar to the general plots of WWI and WWII. He replaces technology with magic and follows the view points of many characters from various classes of society. Interesting to me is the way that Turtledove uses magic as a field of study. It is more along the lines of a science, which works well when his mage characters begin to delve into the magic which is nuclear technology in our world.

Another story I just recently picked up, Phillip Pullman’s His Dark Materials, turned out to be much more than juvenile fiction. His first book explores a world where the Protestant Reformation never took place and the series has deep ties to John Milton’s Paradise Lost, arguably one of the greatest pieces of literature written in the English language.

Not only is it entertaining for us to change the things most static in our lives out and see how they would play out, it’s also a way to contemplate on our current situation and think about things abstractly. Speculative fiction is the original life simulation experiment–before Will Wright. In some cases, as we travel forward through time, that which was science fiction becomes reality and the value of having previously explored these topics becomes invaluable. How important will Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics be in the future?

The types of human beings that are most comfortable exploring new ideas and not clinging to stability are often the most interesting and trail blazing types of people. Exploring theoretical  worlds where the things that are the most concrete in our lives are changed, promotes the type of malleable thinking that needs to accompany important decisions.

Because, don’t we hope that the folks who build the Predator drones remember the Skynet I’m thinking of.

Posted in What I'm Reading, Writing | Leave a Comment »